TY  - BOOK
AU  - Forslund,Tommie
AU  -  Granqvist,Pehr
AU  -  Hammarlund,Mårten
AU  -  van IJzendoorn,Marinus H.
AU  -  Sagi-Schwartz,Avi
AU  -  Glaser,Danya
AU  -  Steele,Miriam
AU  -  Steele,Howard
AU  -  Shaver,Phillip R.
AU  -  Schuengel,Carlo
AU  -  Bakermans-Kranenburg,Marian J.
AU  -  Lux,Ulrike
AU  -  Simmonds,John
AU  -  Jacobvitz,Deborah
AU  -  Groh,Ashley M.
AU  -  Bernard,Kristin
AU  -  Cyr,Chantal
AU  -  Hazen,Nancy L.
AU  -  Foster,Sarah
AU  -  Psouni,Elia
AU  -  Cowan,Philip A.
AU  -  Pape Cowan,Carolyn
AU  -  Rifkin-Graboi,Anne
AU  -  Wilkins,David
AU  -  Pierrehumbert,Blaise
AU  -  Tarabulsy,George M.
AU  -  Cárcamo,Rodrigo A.
AU  -  Wang,Zhengyan
AU  -  Liang,Xi
AU  -  Kaźmierczak,Maria
AU  -  Pawlicka,Paulina
AU  -  Ayiro,Lilian
AU  -  Chansa,Tamara
AU  -  Sichimba,Francis
AU  -  Mooya,Haatembo
AU  -  McLean,Loyola
AU  -  Veríssimo,Manuela
AU  -  Gojman-
AU  -  Moretti,Marlene M.
AU  -  Bacro,Fabien
AU  -  Peltola,Mikko J.
AU  -  Galbally,Megan
AU  -  Kondo-Ikemura,Kiyomi
AU  -  Behrens,Kazuko Y.
AU  -  Scott,Stephen
AU  -  Fresno Rodriguez,Andrés
AU  -  Spencer,Rosario
AU  -  Posada,Germán
AU  -  Cassibba,Rosalinda
AU  -  Barrantes-Vidal,Neus
AU  -  Palacios,Jesús
AU  -  Barone,Lavinia
AU  -  Madigan,Sheri
AU  -  Jones-Mason,Karen
AU  -  Juffer,Femmie
AU  -  Pasco Fearon,Richard
AU  -  Bernier,Annie
AU  -  Cicchetti,Dante
AU  -  Roisman,Glenn I.
AU  -  Cassidy,Jude
AU  -  Kindler,Heinz
AU  -  Zimmermann,Peter
AU  -  Feldman,Ruth
AU  -  Spangler,Gottfried
AU  -  Zeanah,Charles H.
AU  -  Dozier,Mary
AU  -  Belsky,Jay
AU  -  Lamb,Michael E.
AU  -  Reijman,Sophie
AU  -  Duschinsky,Robbie
TI  - Attachment goes to court: Child protection and child custody issues
PY  - 2022///.
							
N1  - 71
N2  - Attachment theory and research are drawn upon in many applied settings, including family courts, but misunderstandings are widespread and sometimes result in misapplications. The aim of this consensus statement is, therefore, to enhance understanding, counter misinformation, and steer family-court utilization of attachment theory in a supportive, evidence-based direction, especially with regard to child protection and child custody decision-making. The article is divided into two parts. In the first, we address problems related to the use of attachment theory and research in family courts, and discuss reasons for these problems. To this end, we examine family court applications of attachment theory in the current context of the best-interest-of-the-child standard, discuss misunderstandings regarding attachment theory, and identify factors that have hindered accurate implementation. In the second part, we provide recommendations for the application of attachment theory and research. To this end, we set out three attachment principles: the child’s need for familiar, non-abusive caregivers; the value of continuity of good-enough care; and the benefits of networks of attachment relationships. We also discuss the suitability of assessments of attachment quality and caregiving behavior to inform family court decision-making. We conclude that assessments of caregiver behavior should take center stage. Although there is dissensus among us regarding the use of assessments of attachment quality to inform child custody and child-protection decisions, such assessments are currently most suitable for targeting and directing supportive interventions. Finally, we provide directions to guide future interdisciplinary research collaboration
UR  - https://shs.cairn.info/journal-devenir-2022-1-page-15?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
ER  -