Image de Google Jackets
Vue normale Vue MARC vue ISBD

Who likes the rebels and who likes the allegiants? The role of membership and status in the judgment of rebel attributions

Par : Contributeur(s) : Type de matériel : TexteTexteLangue : français Détails de publication : 2011. Sujet(s) : Ressources en ligne : Abrégé : Rebel attributions are less valued than allegiant ones when it comes to explain one’s failure. Nevertheless, rebels can be sometimes positively viewed and even celebrated. We examined the role of inter-group dynamics at stake in the social judgment of such attribution types. 75 males and 75 females judged a male or a female target using allegiant vs. rebel attributions for a negative professional event. We hypothesized and found that high-status members judged the rebel targets less efficacious and less likable than the allegiant target, but only when the target was from the in-group. Low-status members judged the in-group target as more efficacious than the out-group target, but judged the rebel target as less likable than the allegiant target. These findings contribute to better understand the intergroup processes underlying the social judgment of rebel attributions, and more broadly the differences in social judgment between attribution types.
Tags de cette bibliothèque : Pas de tags pour ce titre. Connectez-vous pour ajouter des tags.
Evaluations
    Classement moyen : 0.0 (0 votes)
Nous n'avons pas d'exemplaire de ce document

7

Rebel attributions are less valued than allegiant ones when it comes to explain one’s failure. Nevertheless, rebels can be sometimes positively viewed and even celebrated. We examined the role of inter-group dynamics at stake in the social judgment of such attribution types. 75 males and 75 females judged a male or a female target using allegiant vs. rebel attributions for a negative professional event. We hypothesized and found that high-status members judged the rebel targets less efficacious and less likable than the allegiant target, but only when the target was from the in-group. Low-status members judged the in-group target as more efficacious than the out-group target, but judged the rebel target as less likable than the allegiant target. These findings contribute to better understand the intergroup processes underlying the social judgment of rebel attributions, and more broadly the differences in social judgment between attribution types.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025