000 | 02908cam a2200193 4500500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
005 | 20250125141102.0 | ||
041 | _afre | ||
042 | _adc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 |
_aLavorel, Sandra _eauthor |
700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Bierry, Adeline _eauthor |
700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Crouzat, Émilie _eauthor |
245 | 0 | 0 | _aGestion intégrée des territoires par une approche par les réseaux de services |
260 | _c2016. | ||
500 | _a33 | ||
520 | _aResume Le concept de service écosystémique est à la fois simple et intuitif a priori, mais devient plus complexe dès qu’on s’intéresse à sa mise en œuvre dans une optique de planification et de gestion territoriale. En effet, l'évaluation des bénéfices apportés par les écosystèmes sur un territoire est délicate et nécessite une analyse du fonctionnement et des relations entre les différents services. Dans cet article, les auteurs illustrent une application simple de la notion de réseaux de services écosystémiques au cas du bassin d’emploi grenoblois, où une recherche transdisciplinaire permet de mettre en regard les analyses des relations biophysiques entre services et les relations perçues par les acteurs au travers des enjeux de gestion du territoire. | ||
520 | _aThe ecosystem service concept is both simple and intuitive at first sight, but more complex when moving to implementation. In particular regional planning and land management must take into account positive and negative relationships between individual ecosystem services, whether these translate direct ecological processes, shared drivers such as land use and management, or synergies and conflicts in demands by different actors. The notion of ecosystem service bundle, which is now becoming familiar to managers and decision makers, emphasises that different ecosystem services cannot be managed independently. The novel concept of ecosystem service network takes this idea one step further by analysing explicitly the dependencies between provisioning and cultural services targeted by management, biodiversity and regulation services underpinning their production (or ‘resources’), and regulation and cultural ecosystem services impacted by management. We present a first application of the ecosystem service network concept for the Grenoble urban region (France), where transdisciplinary research compares ecosystem service networks identified through biophysical analyses and relationships perceived by local actors through key management stakes. This analysis highlights the current gap between ecological knowledge and awareness by managers and decision-makers, which projects such as this can help bridging in order to co-design future sustainable landscapes. | ||
786 | 0 | _nSciences Eaux & Territoires | uméro 21 | 4 | 2016-12-21 | p. 10-17 | 2109-3016 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/revue-sciences-eaux-et-territoires-2016-4-page-10?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
999 |
_c1012150 _d1012150 |