000 | 01299cam a2200193 4500500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
005 | 20250127010619.0 | ||
041 | _afre | ||
042 | _adc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 |
_aLyubareva, Inna _eauthor |
700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Brisson, Laurent _eauthor |
700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Bothorel, Cécile _eauthor |
700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Billot, Romain _eauthor |
245 | 0 | 0 | _aA crowdfunding platform and its social network: The example of Ulule |
260 | _c2020. | ||
500 | _a3 | ||
520 | _aOur empirical study of the crowdfunding platform Ulule reveals the existence of a transversal social network at the platform scale. This social network has a catalyzing effect on crowdfunding campaigns. The results highlight five sub-groups of contributors within the social network—sponsors, followers, precursors, specialists, and collaborative specialists. Then, the analysis underlines a global and positive impact of the social network on the success rate. This positive influence becomes even more significant in the presence of sub-groups of contributors characterized by some thematic specialization and higher rates of collaboration. | ||
786 | 0 | _nRevue française de gestion | o 286 | 1 | 2020-06-03 | p. 135-151 | 0338-4551 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-francaise-de-gestion-2020-1-page-135?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
999 |
_c1051810 _d1051810 |