000			01815cam a2200349 4500500
005			20250131022033.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aTraversa, Luciano _eauthor
245	0	0	_aDefaming Aristocracies in the Political Trials at the End of the Republic: The Accusations of (in)constantia and of simulatio
260			_c2024.
500			_a52
520			_aThis paper focuses on attacks on the honour of the aristocracy in political trials, namely a distinctive feature of the late Roman Republic. The widespread conflict and competitiveness of those years is attested by the judicial oratory, a privileged source in these pages. In particular, we intend to investigate the rhetorical arguments of inconstantia/ constantia and simulatio, often used jointly to tarnish the image of the nobility, with differences between the attacks inflicted on the traditional aristocracy and those directed at the new nobilitas formed after the Social War. Throughout a diachronic study of this type of attacks, a case dating back to the age of the Gracchi will be compared with some events dating back to first century BC and reconstructed from Cicero’s perspective.
690			_aoratory.
690			_anobilitas
690			_aconcepts
690			_aCicero
690			_asimulatio
690			_avalues
690			_ainconstantia
690			_aRoman republic
690			_aoratory.
690			_aconcepts
690			_aCicero
690			_avalues
690			_asimulatio
690			_ainconstantia
690			_anobilitas
690			_aRoman republic
786	0		_nDialogues d’histoire ancienne | S 28 | S28 | 2024-05-24 | p. 159-171 | 0755-7256
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-dialogues-d-histoire-ancienne-2024-S28-page-159?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c1058193 _d1058193