000			01846cam a2200325 4500500
005			20250202102017.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aDouillet, Anne-Cécile _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Lebrou, Vincent _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Sigalo Santos, Luc _eauthor
245	0	0	_aCrossing bureaucratic boundaries. From (de)sectorization to cross-cutting policies
260			_c2023.
500			_a69
520			_aThe proliferation of policies and instruments described as “transversal”, “intersectoral”, “mainstreaming”, etc. seems to challenge the historical sectoral organisation of public policies. Policy studies often see them as a response to the “complexification” of public problems. Anchored in a constructivist perspective, instead this issue apprehends the boundaries of public intervention as objects and products of a competitive process of organizational designing. Bringing together policy studies and the sociology of professions, the articles gathered together in this issue examine different forms of boundary work – whether it be dominated by tinkering or institutionalization – and the ways in which they affect professional and institutional relations, and sometimes the very content of public policies.
690			_apublic problems
690			_asector
690			_atransversality
690			_aboundaries
690			_aprofessional jurisdictions
690			_apublic policy
690			_apublic problems
690			_asector
690			_atransversality
690			_aboundaries
690			_aprofessional jurisdictions
690			_apublic policy
786	0		_nGouvernement et action publique | VOL. 12 | 1 | 2023-04-13 | p. 9-26 | 2260-0965
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-gouvernement-et-action-publique-2023-1-page-9?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c1061778 _d1061778