| 000 | 01129cam a2200217 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250204173016.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aIsraël, Liora _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aMethodological Question(s) |
| 260 | _c2009. | ||
| 500 | _a61 | ||
| 520 | _aThis article revisits common approaches that tend to assign a peculiar methodological stance to legal sociology in relationship to the externality to the law. The “necessity” to take a stand on this point is put into question, as it reveals a faith in the peculiar nature of law that is harmful to a proper sociological analysis. This is why we propose to defend a methodological neutrality towards law, in order to be able to eventually demonstrate, instead of presupposing, the social properties of law. | ||
| 690 | _aMethodology | ||
| 690 | _aConstitutive Theory of Law | ||
| 690 | _aLaw | ||
| 690 | _aSociology. | ||
| 690 | _aEpistemology | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nDroit et société | o 69-70 | 2 | 2009-01-20 | p. 381-395 | 0769-3362 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-droit-et-societe1-2008-2-page-381?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
| 999 |
_c1064449 _d1064449 |
||