000			01328cam a2200157 4500500
005			20250206191210.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aOtayek, René _eauthor
245	0	0	_aCultural Pluralism and Political Regime(s): Trying to Compare Africa and the Arab World
260			_c2013.
500			_a73
520			_aContrary to what might be thought, the regulation of cultural pluralism (ethnic, religious, sectarian, linguistic...) is not the monopoly of democratic regimes; authoritarian regimes also have to do so as their stability and legitimacy is often involved. Such regulation in authoritarian situations is indeed a strategic resource that permits obedience and consent to domination to be gained. The longevity of authoritarian regimes in Sub-Saharan Africa and in the Arab world, particularly in the Middle East, certainly owes much to this resource, though it does not totally and indefinitely immunize them from dissent. In fine, this need for regulation tends somewhat to somehow confuse the boundary between democratic regimes and authoritarian ones.
786	0		_nRevue internationale de politique comparée | 20 | 2 | 2013-11-04 | p. 101-123 | 1370-0731
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-internationale-de-politique-comparee-2013-2-page-101?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c1070448 _d1070448