000			01759cam a2200277 4500500
005			20250207003119.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aOlivier, Alice _eauthor
245	0	0	_aQuality men. Gender and (dis)qualification in “feminine” higher education training
260			_c2023.
500			_a67
520			_aHow qualified is the work of men in “feminine” professions, and what insights does this bring into the links between gender and qualification? This article explores this question through interviews and observations carried out in training courses for midwives and social workers, focusing on the professional practice of support. To support patients and users, the few male students must demonstrate certain so-called “feminine” dispositions. Such dispositions are often assumed to be more self-evident for women, and are constructed and recognized as the result of work for these men, and as such are distinctive. The male students are also valued for their gender through multiple biases, which reveals a “masculine nature” qualification. Lastly, these men are perceived and, above all, perceive themselves as endowed with marked professionalism, which strongly qualifies their work and disqualifies that of women.
690			_aqualification
690			_agender
690			_asupport work
690			_amen
690			_a« female » training
690			_aqualification
690			_agender
690			_asupport work
690			_amen
690			_a« female » training
786	0		_nTravail, genre et sociétés | o 49 | 1 | 2023-04-12 | p. 123-140 | 1294-6303
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-travail-genre-et-societes-2023-1-page-123?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c1071255 _d1071255