| 000 | 01391cam a2200229 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250413012616.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aBontems, Vincent Karim _eauthor |
| 700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Bontems, Vincent Karim _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aWhat does Innovation stand for? Review of a watchword in research policies |
| 260 | _c2014. | ||
| 500 | _a81 | ||
| 520 | _aInnovation is on the agenda of all scientific policies without really being defined. The study of the evolution of the works that argued to have defined a consisting concept of innovation (Bacon, Machiavelli), or developed a coherent theory of innovation (Tarde, Rogers, Schumpeter), provides insight into some weakness of the models of the innovation process (“linear theory”, “chain-linked model”), or even into the contradictions that are occulted by a naïve use of the concept. Innovation therefore appears as a “watchword” legitimizing that “everything changes so that nothing changes”.JEL codes: O31, O31, G38, O32, B25 | ||
| 690 | _ainnovation | ||
| 690 | _ainvention | ||
| 690 | _aresearch and development | ||
| 690 | _aresearch policies | ||
| 690 | _aSchumpeter | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nJournal of Innovation Economics & Management | 15 | 3 | 2014-09-09 | p. 39-57 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/revue-journal-of-innovation-economics-2014-3-page-39?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
| 999 |
_c1105952 _d1105952 |
||