| 000 | 01439cam a2200193 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250413020419.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aPerrin, Nicolas _eauthor |
| 700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Martin, Gaëlle _eauthor |
| 700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Piot, David _eauthor |
| 700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Drakos, Artémis _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aEstablishing activity as a third entity in order to form the collective in training within the process of institutionalization |
| 260 | _c2025. | ||
| 500 | _a26 | ||
| 520 | _aIn training situations, the collective is often presumed. However, it is not a given. Kaufmann (2010) proposes that the individual (I), the group (we), and a third entity they form a triangulation that unifies the collective. In this contribution, we analyse how a trainer enables this triangulation and under what conditions activity, as analyzed in the training situation, can become a third entity. We study how a trainer contributes to a process of institutionalization, with the focus being on activity, by adopting a second-person approach as an “empathetic coach.” The institutionalization process then consists of collectively exploring the evolution of doing|understanding, i.e., a doing that enables understanding, which in turn guides the doing that organizes itself. | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nPhronesis | 14 | 4 | 2025-03-14 | p. 139-160 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/revue-phronesis-2025-4-page-139?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
| 999 |
_c1114535 _d1114535 |
||