000			01766cam a2200277 4500500
005			20250413023459.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aLe Guern, Philippe _eauthor
245	0	0	_aWhat is the nature of nature? Non-humans, cosmovisions, and cosmopolitics
260			_c2023.
500			_a66
520			_aShould we consider that nature is the world reserved for non-humans, while culture is home to humans, the latter being endowed with reflexivity, a moral sense, rights and the ability to transform their environment through technology, unlike the former? Should we oppose a world of non-humans accessible through science to a world of humans accessible through the social sciences? By challenging the idea of a radical separation between nature and culture and relativising the universalist scope of the concept of nature, contemporary anthropology has drawn our attention to the underlying principle that structures modern Western thought, while at the same time revealing other ways of being in the world and dealing with non-humans. This article looks at the notion of “nature” and some of the debates to which it has given rise – particularly in ethical and legal terms – and asks whether the interests of non-humans can be taken into account.
690			_acosmopolitics
690			_aethics
690			_anature
690			_anon-humans
690			_athe Anthropocene
690			_acosmopolitics
690			_aethics
690			_anature
690			_anon-humans
690			_athe Anthropocene
786	0		_nPolitiques de communication | - | HS2 | 2023-12-15 | p. 117-146 | 2271-068X
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-politiques-de-communication-2023-HS2-page-117?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c1121314 _d1121314