000			01524cam a2200217 4500500
005			20250413023900.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aRambaud, Elsa _eauthor
245	0	0	_a“Great” critique, “little” critique, and “the” revolution
260			_c2017.
500			_a30
520			_aInspired by the thoughts of M. Walzer, this article examines conventional meaning of criticism shared by the philosophical tradition and the most opponent sociological models: critical sociology (P. Bourdieu) and pragmatic sociology of critic (L. Boltanski). It shows that this perspective focuses on only one kind of criticism  the social critic  and maybe something else: the ideal of emancipation for an intellectual people. For a better understanding of the different forms, effects and social factors of social criticism (i.e. criticism taking place in society), it proposes a non-normative definition of criticism contrasting with the social scientist's propensity to conceive the (true) critic as necessarily radical, lucid, theoretically framed, inseparable from emancipation, sociologist's role and left wing legacy.
690			_aCritical Sociology
690			_aNormativity
690			_aPragmatic Sociology of Critic
690			_aSocial Critic
690			_aWalzer
786	0		_nRevue française de science politique | 67 | 3 | 2017-07-04 | p. 469-495
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-francaise-de-science-politique-2017-3-page-469?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c1122136 _d1122136