000 03042cam a2200301zu 4500
001 88965943
003 FRCYB88965943
005 20250429184221.0
006 m o d
007 cr un
008 250429s2022 fr | o|||||0|0|||eng d
020 _a9780128186398
035 _aFRCYB88965943
040 _aFR-PaCSA
_ben
_c
_erda
100 1 _aMartins, A. Nuno
245 0 1 _aInvesting in Disaster Risk Reduction for Resilience
_bDesign, Methods and Knowledge in the face of Climate Change
_c['Martins, A. Nuno', 'Lizarralde, Gonzalo', 'Egbelakin, Temitope']
264 1 _bElsevier Science
_c2022
300 _a p.
336 _btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _bc
_2rdamdedia
338 _bc
_2rdacarrier
650 0 _a
700 0 _aMartins, A. Nuno
700 0 _aLizarralde, Gonzalo
700 0 _aEgbelakin, Temitope
856 4 0 _2Cyberlibris
_uhttps://international.scholarvox.com/netsen/book/88965943
_qtext/html
_a
520 _aDisaster prevention and the mitigation of climate change effects call for global action. Joint efforts are required among countries, economic sectors, and public and private stakeholders. Not surprisingly, international organizations, such as the United Nations agencies, propose policy frameworks aimed at worldwide influence. The 2015–2030 Sendai Framework seeks to create consensus about the need to act for disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation. A key goal is to promote investments in risk reduction and resilience. But how useful is this policy framework? What does it say, and what does it overlook? How can it be implemented among vulnerable communities, in historic sites, and in other sensitive locations affected by disasters? In this book, prominent scholars and practitioners examine the successes and failures of the Sendai Framework. Their case studies show that, despite its good intentions, the Framework achieves very little. The main reason is that, while avoiding a political engagement, it fails to deal with disasters' root causes and guide the difficult path of effective implementation.The authors bring a fresh look to international policy and design practices, highlighting cross-disciplinary research avenues, and ideas and methods for low-income communities, cities and heritage sites in Portugal, Haiti, the United States, the Philippines, New Zealand, Sri Lanka, Nigeria, among other countries.Global action requires collaboration between heterogeneous stakeholders, but also the recognition of inequalities, power imbalances, and social and environmental injustices. - Analyzes outcomes and drawbacks of implementing the third priority of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction - Presents real-life attempts to increase risk resilience and climate-change adaptation, both before and after disasters - Addresses design as a means to build resilience in community and heritage interventions - Calls for embracing the complexities and dynamic character of DRR and climate-change knowledge, investment, and communication
999 _c1331258
_d1331258