| 000 | 01117cam a2200157 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250112021855.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aGenest, Jean-François _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aAt the Origins of Sophistry: The Revelation of Future Contingents from a Reading of Richard Fitzralph’s Commentary on the Sentences (II) |
| 260 | _c2003. | ||
| 500 | _a20 | ||
| 520 | _aIn his lecture on the Sentences (I, q. 16), Richard Fitzralph has built up, with regard to the revelation of future contingents, a subtle casuistry. From the idea that the revelation does not eliminate their contingency, he comes, among other radical conclusions, to the one that God might be deceptive. This thesis, which is a possible outcome of the sometimes so-called « Ockhamist » theory of future contingents, was taken up by Adam Wodeham and Robert Holcot. | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nArchives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge | Volume 70 | 1 | 2003-01-01 | p. 317-346 | 0373-5478 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-archives-d-histoire-doctrinale-et-litteraire-du-moyen-age-2003-1-page-317?lang=en |
| 999 |
_c137455 _d137455 |
||