000			01312cam a2200157 4500500
005			20250112024103.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aChainais, Cécile _eauthor
245	0	0	_aReasoned verdicts: Between the said and the unsaid
260			_c2014.
500			_a26
520			_aIn practice, reasoned verdicts reveal the tension between the explicit and the implicit, between what is said and what is not, with reasoning practices often being governed by unavowed arguments, in particular of a sociological nature. In this process, there are also intimate links between the legitimacy of the body handing down the verdict and the terms of its reasoning. Traditionally, an authority does not justify itself : it is better not to give any reasons at all or, at the very least, to keep those reasons as brief as possible. But a change of paradigm is underway, against the backdrop of a redefinition of democratic legitimacy : the care taken in drafting detailed and patiently argued reasoning becomes a fundamental component of persuasion, without which no punishment can ever be perceived as legitimate.
786	0		_nLes Cahiers de la Justice | o 2 | 2 | 2014-05-02 | p. 241-258 | 1958-3702
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-les-cahiers-de-la-justice-2014-2-page-241?lang=en
999			_c144603 _d144603