000			01912cam a2200193 4500500
005			20250112024359.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aGeiger, Niels _eauthor
245	0	0	_aCycles “versus” growth in Schumpeter
260			_c2014.
500			_a89
520			_aSchumpeter’s business cycle and growth theory encompasses two distinct types of superposition. The first one is well known from its graphical representation provided in Schumpeter’s Business Cycles [1939], namely the superposition of different waves or cycles of varying magnitude. There already is an element of combination of growth (Kondratiev) and cyclical movements such as “ordinary” business cycles (Juglar) here, although the connection between these waves of different order is not elaborated. Another point which is much more rarely discussed in the literature is Schumpeter’s strict technical separation between a growth trend and cyclical waves in real-world economies. It appears as if the general interpretation of Schumpeter’s statement here has also been influenced by the aforementioned graphical representation. The argument for the distinction between underlying growth on the one hand, and cyclical elements on the other, is put forward strongly in two papers [1927; 1935] especially, but lacks a graphical sketch of the core ideas by Schumpeter himself. The present paper aims at proposing just this by interpreting Schumpeter’s logic, thereby illustrating the model in more detail and hinting at a possible inaccuracy in the Business Cycles graph. JEL classification: B15, B25, E32
690			_abusiness cycle theory
690			_acycle and growth interdependence
690			_asuperposition
786	0		_nPapers in Political Economy | o 67 | 2 | 2014-12-01 | p. 35-54 | 0154-8344
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-papers-in-political-economy-1-2014-2-page-35?lang=en
999			_c145588 _d145588