000			01542cam a2200193 4500500
005			20250112024400.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aPouchol, Marlyse _eauthor
245	0	0	_aAgainst a Post-Hayekian Economic Philosophy
260			_c2013.
500			_a77
520			_aThis paper approaches economic philosophy in a field with three converging pairs: political economy/social philosophy, normative economics/moral philosophy, and economics/philosophy of science. The paper first shows that economic philosophy presupposes a Hayekian conception of how the human mind forms and the ways of economic progress; a design that offers the possibility of linking biological, moral, and epistemological arguments in a single whole. Despite this heritage, it is also undeniable that economic philosophy keeps its distance with respect to Hayek, in particular, from the standpoint of the criteria for validating a theory. While Hayek is animated by a concern for scientific truth, economic philosophy considers it necessary to establish another criterion for validity, this time the predictive ability of a theory. However, this does not necessarily indicate a critical distance from Hayek; rather, it can be considered an act of further allegiance.
690			_aHayek
690			_amethodology
690			_aeconomic philosophy
786	0		_nPapers in Political Economy | o 65 | 2 | 2013-12-01 | p. 203-226 | 0154-8344
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-papers-in-political-economy-1-2013-2-page-203?lang=en
999			_c145593 _d145593