000			01661cam a2200241 4500500
005			20250112025025.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aSchneider, Monique _eauthor
245	0	0	_aThe Impasses of Filiation and the Question of the Feminine
260			_c2001.
500			_a2
520			_aA gap separates the spatial inscription of filiation in genealogical trees and the logic inherent in the thought processes concerning filiation. Through different channels, W. Granoff, C. Stein, and E. Benveniste have stressed the primacy, in Western thought and in Freudian elaboration, of a linear representation of filiation, proceeding from the father and reposing either on “sidelining” the feminine, as in the thinking of Granoff, on the construction of the “immortal and unengendered father,” as in the thinking of Stein, or on the absence, in the European lexis, as analyzed by E. Benveniste, of the adjective matrius. By studying the looking and naming prohibition concerning the matrilineal side in Totem and Taboo, Freud would take psychoanalytical thinking in two directions: taking cultural priority into account by insisting on paternal polarity, and encouraging a line of thinking that leads back to questioning the origin of the maternal  Heim.
690			_a« Motherless Athena »
690			_agenealogy
690			_apaternity
690			_aErinyes
690			_aprohibition
690			_adecision
690			_aancestor
786	0		_nCliniques méditerranéennes | o 63 | 1 | 2001-03-01 | p. 7-17 | 0762-7491
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-cliniques-mediterraneennes-2001-1-page-7?lang=en
999			_c147580 _d147580