000			01574cam a2200229 4500500
005			20250112025600.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aDavallon, Jean _eauthor
245	0	0	_aFrom the work of art to the heritage object
260			_c2019.
500			_a78
520			_aHow can reading Genette’s L’Œuvre de l’art help us to understand the status of the heritage object? This article reflects on the utility of deploying Genette’s opposition between autography and allography to define heritage. The similar characteristics of the allographic works and of intangible cultural heritage raise three questions. First, I consider the legitimacy of transferring the Genettian approach onto the heritage object; next, I look at the relevance of borrowing the ontological distinction between autography and allography; and last, I analyze the contribution of Genette’s ontological approach to the study of heritage objects. The paper reveals similarities and differences, especially between the artistic function and heritage status. Genette’s approach helps to reveal the specificity of the two types of heritage and the role of the institution in defining the heritage object.
690			_aallography
690			_aAutography
690			_aontology
690			_atangible heritage
690			_aintangible heritage
690			_apreservation
786	0		_nCommunication & langages | o 202 | 4 | 2019-11-20 | p. 133-152 | 0336-1500
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-communication-et-langages-2019-4-page-133?lang=en
999			_c149452 _d149452