000			01599cam a2200229 4500500
005			20250112025650.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aFraenkel, Béatrice _eauthor
245	0	0	_aThe notion of the “event of writing”
260			_c2018.
500			_a24
520			_aWhat does the expression “event of writing” mean? This analysis shows that the expression combines the notion of the event—which has been largely debated by historians since Braudel (1985)—with the notion of the “literacy event” (Heath 1983), created by researchers with close ties to ethnographers of communication (Hymes 1962). However, the theoretical currents of structuralism and functionalism that dominate this double genesis have either rejected the notion of “event,” considering it to be outside their field of study, or they have ignored it by prioritizing studies of routine writing practices that are seen as small, everyday events. If we want to study these acts of writing that interest us—these singular, exceptional, heroic acts observed in public spaces—we must change the paradigm and construct a concept of the “event of writing” that combines a pragmatic anthropological approach and a theory of “writing acts.”
690			_ahistory
690			_aliteracy
690			_apolitics
690			_awritings
690			_aevents
690			_ahistory of writing
786	0		_nCommunication & langages | o 197 | 3 | 2018-12-04 | p. 35-52 | 0336-1500
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-communication-et-langages-2018-3-page-35?lang=en
999			_c149808 _d149808