000			01854cam a2200181 4500500
005			20250921004002.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aGendron, Corinne _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Yates, Stéphanie _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Friser, Alice _eauthor
245	0	0	_aIs social acceptability a doxa? Let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater.
260			_c2024.
500			_a16
520			_aSocial acceptability remains a controversial term because it has long been used by developers to refer to communication strategies aimed at avoiding or reducing controversy around certain projects. However, like other expressions before it, the meaning given to it by social actors has evolved over the years to the point where the term can be seen as a site of genuine social work concerning the conditions of legitimacy of projects. At the same time, researchers have looked into the factors that explain public attitudes towards projects or public decisions, paving the way for a real theorization of social acceptability within the framework of a more participative democracy. The invocation of social acceptability during the pandemic can be analyzed as discourse, but it should never be confused with the analysis that a researcher might make through the lens of the concept of social acceptability. In Quebec, although the term was rarely used by public authorities, the anticipation of public adherence to health measures was a determining factor in the restrictions imposed, which is easily explained: without social acceptability, these measures would not have been respected and would thus have become ineffective.‪
786	0		_nQuestions de communication | o 45 | 1 | 2024-11-07 | p. 207-220 | 1633-5961
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-questions-de-communication-2024-1-page-207?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c1507092 _d1507092