000			01723cam a2200313 4500500
005			20250112025932.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aVan Den Bavière, Aurélie _eauthor
245	0	0	_aThe rejection of uncertainty in contract law
260			_c2024.
500			_a52
520			_aUncertainty is a central issue in contract law. Is it not traditionally said that the contract is an act of foresight, an act intended to protect against the uncertainties of the future? But predicting is not knowing. At first glance, the forecast raises doubts. The time frame it covers also involves risks: reluctance on the part of the debtor, market developments, health crises, war, and so on. Uncertainty therefore seems consubstantial with the contract because of the potential breach of its conditions. However, while the law cannot overcome natural uncertainty, its objective is to offer, albeit artificially, a form of legal guarantee. How? By promoting objective legal certainty at the contract formation stage and subjective legal certainty at the enforcement stage. In doing so, the contract emerges as a tool of legal certainty that defies natural uncertainty.
690			_aLegal security
690			_aContract
690			_a(un) certainty
690			_a(Un) predictability
690			_aRisk
690			_aForecast
690			_aLegal security
690			_aun) certainty
690			_aContract
690			_a(Un) predictability
690			_a(
690			_aRisk
690			_aForecast
786	0		_nRevue CONFLUENCE : Sciences & Humanités | o 5 | 1 | 2024-05-02 | p. 105-120 | 2826-4029
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-confluence-2024-1-page-105?lang=en
999			_c150765 _d150765