000			02068cam a2200289 4500500
005			20251012013128.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aIriart, Xavier _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Poirier, Philippe _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Costa, Damien _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Dalle, Frédéric _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Coron, Noémie _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Argy, Nicolas _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Favennec, Loïc _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Pernot-Marino, Elodie _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Haim-Boukobza, Stéphanie _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Giannoli, Jean-Marc _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Gabriel, Frédéric _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Robert-Gangneux, Florence _eauthor
245	0	0	_aParasitological examination of stool samples: French ANOFEL/LABAC recommendations
260			_c2025.
500			_a7
520			_aThe parasitological examination of stools is a challenging analysis due to the diversity of parasites to be screened for, which depends on the exposure context and the patient’s clinical background. Parasite detection is traditionally performed using direct wet mount and various concentration methods followed by microscopic reading, which requires expertise. The official billing code for this stool test in the French nomenclature of medical biology procedures has become outdated due to the development of molecular biology techniques and observed epidemiological changes. Nucleic acid detection techniques currently on the market, often in multiplex panels, should not be used without an understanding of their limitations in terms of the relevance of the parasite panel detected and their technical performance. These recommendations aim to guide biologists and COFRAC auditors in selecting techniques and implementing parasitological stool examinations, taking into account their limitations, in order to ensure optimal medical care.
786	0		_nAnnales de Biologie Clinique | 83 | 4 | 2025-09-03 | p. 425-445 | 0003-3898
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-annales-de-biologie-clinique-2025-4-page-425?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c1528439 _d1528439