000			01474cam a2200229 4500500
005			20250112030924.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aMignoth, Dominique-Aimé _eauthor
245	0	0	_aJudge and Arbiter’s Obligations in the Procedural Formula According to Pliny the Younger and Gellius
260			_c2008.
500			_a35
520			_aMany scholars have written upon the origins of the proceeding per formulas, created under the Roman Republic and extended to all inhabitants of the Empire at the beginning of the third century A.D. For want of evidence from the Ancient authors, and because of the rarity and great concision of the legislative texts, we do not know the exact nature of the relations between judges, plaintiffs and arbiters apud iudicem. Above all, we have difficulties to figure out the extent of the liability of the judges and the arbiters who are nominated by the praetor ( nominatio). Later sources let us think that concerns about a just and fair issue led the praetor to establish a posteriori a suitable control to ensure a good justice and the plaintiffs’ protection.
690			_anominatio
690			_aarbiter
690			_aiudex
690			_amisconduct
690			_acivil proceedings
690			_anegligence
786	0		_nDialogues d’histoire ancienne | 34/2 | 2 | 2008-12-01 | p. 80-93 | 0755-7256
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-dialogues-d-histoire-ancienne-2008-2-page-80?lang=en
999			_c153606 _d153606