000 03109cam a2200229 4500500
005 20251214025815.0
041 _afre
042 _adc
100 1 0 _aAnnweiler, Cédric
_eauthor
700 1 0 _aMoulias, Sophie
_eauthor
700 1 0 _aCudennec, Tristan
_eauthor
700 1 0 _aAquino, Jean-Pierre
_eauthor
700 1 0 _aBoddaert, Jacques
_eauthor
700 1 0 _aSalles, Nathalie
_eauthor
700 1 0 _aBonin-Guillaume, Sylvie
_eauthor
245 0 0 _aEnd of life, assisted dying, and geriatrics: Results of a national survey conducted by the French Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology (SFGG)
260 _c2025.
500 _a95
520 _aBackground Amid ongoing societal and legislative debates in France on end-of-life care, the French Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology (SFGG) conducted a national survey to assess the perceptions and expectations of professionals working in the field of aging regarding assisted dying (AD). Method An anonymous online questionnaire was distributed in November–December 2024 to the 1,600 members of the SFGG. The survey gathered 471 responses, 90% of them from doctors, covering knowledge of the current legal framework, opinions on possible changes to the legislation, anticipated professional impacts, and patient feedback. Results Among the respondents, 58.6% reported having precise knowledge of the current legislative framework and applying it regularly, while 39.7% had only partial knowledge. Regarding desired legal changes, 27.5% wished to maintain the current legislative framework, and 41.8% of respondents rejected all proposed forms of assisted dying. This suggests that the very way the debate is framed may not align with their clinical or ethical perspectives. Should the law change, 25.9% would support assisted suicide supervised by a medical team, 17.8% would favor assisted suicide facilitated by an association, 9.1% would support the issuance of a lethal prescription for self-administration by the patient, and 7.2% would favor euthanasia, defined as the direct administration of a lethal substance by a health care professional. Only 12.5% reported not having a definitive opinion. In the event of the legalization of assisted dying, 48.2% of respondents would consider invoking a conscience clause, 24% might consider leaving their position, and 21.9% would be willing to participate in its implementation. Finally, 68.2% believed that the SFGG should play an active role in the public debate. Conclusion The national French survey highlights a wide range of opinions among geriatric professionals, reflecting both cautious support for certain forms of AD and deep ethical and professional concerns. These findings underscore the need for a well-informed, ethically grounded debate that carefully considers the specific vulnerabilities of older adults.
786 0 _nGériatrie et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie du Vieillissement | 23 | 3 | 2025-09-29 | p. 283-288 | 2115-8789
856 4 1 _uhttps://stm.cairn.info/journal-geriatrie-et-psychologie-neuropsychiatrie-du-vieillissement-2025-3-page-283?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999 _c1573061
_d1573061