000 01525cam a2200205 4500500
005 20251214030050.0
041 _afre
042 _adc
100 1 0 _aDelanaye, Pierre
_eauthor
700 1 0 _aFocant, Jean-François
_eauthor
700 1 0 _aMariat, Christophe
_eauthor
700 1 0 _aDelanghe, Joris
_eauthor
700 1 0 _aCavalier, Etienne
_eauthor
245 0 0 _aOnce upon a time in nephrology. Episode 2: A brief history of creatinine measurement
260 _c2025.
500 _a13
520 _aThis contribution examines whether—and how—the responsibility of health care professionals is likely to be transformed as a result of advances in artificial intelligence. To address this question, it first clarifies the conditions that define the notion of responsibility, and then considers the performance of algorithmic systems in terms of information processing, visualization, and prediction. In this context, the three acts that express medical responsibility (diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic guidance) could potentially be, at least in part, assumed by AI systems. The consequences of this evolving situation are discussed in terms of the fundamental legal division between persons and things, and in light of the support that certain ethical practices may offer in this context.
786 0 _nNéphrologie & Thérapeutique | Volume 21 | 4 | 2025-09-25 | p. 199-207 | 1769-7255
856 4 1 _uhttps://stm.cairn.info/journal-nephrologie-therapeutique-2025-4-page-199?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999 _c1573383
_d1573383