000			01492cam a2200157 4500500
005			20251214030410.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aAllain-Dupré, Brigitte _eauthor
245	0	0	_aDebates: Reply to Andrew Samuels' article “Will the Post-Jungians Survive?”
260			_c2000.
500			_a85
520			_aBrigitte Allain-Dupré replies to Mr. Samuels’ article by pointing out several flaws, in particular regarding the use of the concept of post-Jungian. It is difficult to describe the criteria on which the analysts’ membership in a Jungian society is based, and it is extremely complicated to define the relationships to Jung which are woven by such a society. Regarding the danger of fundamentalist and/or Freudian trends Mr. Samuels cautions against, the author recommends clinical work in inter-society groups as a preventive measure. The practice already exists, and the French are involved. In this way, more or less implicit presumptions which everyone applies to his interpretation of Jungian thought can be examined. Lastly, the author postulates that the thought and practice of Jungian analysis are not validated by the university; instead, each analyst should be committed to his or her subjectivity and ethical position.
786	0		_nCahiers jungiens de psychanalyse | 97 | 1 | 2000-01-01 | p. 103-112 | 0984-8207
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-cahiers-jungiens-de-psychanalyse-2000-1-page-103?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c1573845 _d1573845