000			02110cam a2200325 4500500
005			20251214031337.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aMarchadier, Fabien _eauthor
700	1	0	_aPoméon O’Neill, Alexandra _eauthor
700	1	0	_aBooth, Katherine _eauthor
245	0	0	_aDual nationality serving individual interests
260			_c2023.
500			_a67
520			_a‪This research, based on in-depth interviews with eighteen naturalized citizens and three residents who attempted or considered naturalization in Japan, examines the attitudes towards the perceived obligation to renounce one’s former citizenship, and how those restrictions influence their identification to Japan and their country of origin. This article‪‪ argues that ambiguity surrounding the single-citizenship principle in the Nationality Law leads many naturalized informants to renounce their former nationality and become mononational Japanese, however this does not necessarily result in a stronger identification to Japan. Rather, ethnicity and how it is racialized in Japanese society seems to be a much more significant factor influencing the feeling of belonging to Japan. Specifically, migrants who phenotypically are seen as “white” are more likely to identify as Japanese, while migrants from the “Global South” usually base their identification on their country of origin.‪
690			_aapatridie
690			_acitoyenneté européenne
690			_aconflit positif de nationalités
690			_adouble nationalité
690			_adroit de l’Union européenne
690			_adroits fondamentaux
690			_adual nationality
690			_aEuropean citizenship
690			_aEuropean Union law
690			_afundamental rights
690			_apositive conflict of nationalities
690			_astatelessness
786	0		_nRevue européenne des migrations internationales | 39 | 2-3 | 2023-07-10 | p. 197-206 | 0765-0752
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-europeenne-des-migrations-internationales-2023-2-page-197?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c1574807 _d1574807