000			01377cam a2200181 4500500
005			20251214032341.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aRedon, Marie _eauthor
700	1	0	_aSeran, Thuy _eauthor
700	1	0	_aCadenza Academic Translations _eauthor
245	0	0	_aFront matter
260			_c2025.
500			_a31
520			_aThis article aims to analyze and compare the categories of alienation, ideology and fetishism insofar as they refer to objective illusion in Marx’s writings, in order to test the hypothesis that the critique of illusion is a unifying element in his theoretical development. The aim is to highlight the similar structures in the three categories, but also their fundamental differences. They share the duality between a representational instance and a real instance, each defined by inversions between subject and object, so that the relationship between these instances can be measured by the relationship between the inversions that each of them contains. Consequently, the notion of objectivity also changes, particularly with regard to alienation and ideology on the one hand, and fetishism on the other.
786	0		_nChronique Internationale de l'IRES | 191 | 3 | 2025-09-24 | p. 1-2 | 1285-087X
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-chronique-internationale-de-lires-2025-3-page-1?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c1575306 _d1575306