000			01281cam a2200181 4500500
005			20260208001140.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aBeaurain, Nicole _eauthor
700	1	0	_aPassevant, Christiane _eauthor
700	1	0	_aPortis, Larry _eauthor
245	0	0	_aLe cinéma populaire et ses idéologies
260			_c2004.
500			_a46
520			_aAbstract A feeling of obviousness, but also of malaise, is elicited by simply mentioning reproduction techniques. Analyzing the four key figures of the researcher, the doctor, the man and the woman on the basis of around a thousand medical files from the procreation assitance service of a hospital reveals how such feelings can be understood as the effect of factors such as medical power and gender domination as well as medicalization and calls to maternity. In oppositon to this structure of authority, turbulences emerge that destabilize established conceptions of parenthood and the approved limits placed on research or on procreative time-frames, and which lead to new types of questions in this field.
786	0		_nL'Homme & la Société | 154 | 4 | 2004-12-01 | p. 5-8 | 0018-4306
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/revue-l-homme-et-la-societe-2004-4-page-5?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c1644460 _d1644460