000			01330cam a2200157 4500500
005			20260208003724.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aDixsaut, Monique _eauthor
245	0	0	_aPourquoi le politique ?
260			_c2005.
500			_a20
520			_aPlato’s Statesman is usually read as a tedious and carelessly written exercise in dialectic, or, more charitably, as a patchwork of loosely connected applications of different methods of definition of statesmanship (division, myth and paradigm). In this paper, I argue that this much disputed problem of the unity of the dialogue can be solved, provided one reads the whole dialogue as what it claims to be, i.e. the developpment of a single diaíresis. It can be shown that the Eleatic Visitor makes use of the myth, of the analysis of paradigms and of the treatment of non-ideal constitutions as means to following a single path, throughout the whole dialogue, that leads to the definition of statesmanship as it should be. The Statesman emerges as Plato’s most profound reflection on the possibilities and the limits of the diairetic method.
786	0		_nLes Études philosophiques | 74 | 3 | 2005-09-01 | p. 289-294 | 0014-2166
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/revue-les-etudes-philosophiques-2005-3-page-289?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c1648658 _d1648658