000			01628cam a2200277 4500500
005			20250112034928.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aAdam-Ledunois, Sonia _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Mansuy, Romuald _eauthor
245	0	0	_aCollaborative public management tools: a myth? The case of the shared territorial assessment
260			_c2020.
500			_a56
520			_aL’article interroge la capacité d’un outil de gestion publique à modifier, via son processus d’appropriation, la nature des relations entre acteurs présents sur un même secteur et un même territoire. À partir de deux études de cas, nous montrons qu’un outil à visée collaborative peut devenir instrument d’objectivation d’un fonctionnement cloisonné.
520			_aThis article questions a public management tool’s ability to modify – through the process of its adoption – the nature of the relations between actors present in the same sector and territory. Through two case studies, we demonstrate that a tool aimed at collaboration can in fact become an instrument that reinforces a compartmentalized mode of operation.
690			_apublic/private collaboration
690			_apublic management tool
690			_asocial policy
690			_ashared assessment
690			_apublic/private collaboration
690			_apublic management tool
690			_asocial policy
690			_ashared assessment
786	0		_nGestion et management public | Volume 7 | 3 | 2020-05-12 | p. 49-69 | 2116-8865
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-gestion-et-management-public-2019-3-page-49?lang=en
999			_c170272 _d170272