| 000 | 01333cam a2200157 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20260322002400.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aTrochet, Jean-René _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aMarc Grodwohl (in collaboration with François Hengy and Christine Verry), Les Villageois de Lutter en leurs demeures, Tome II. Des visages aux fenêtres, 1450-1630, Hégenheim, Cercle d'Histoire de Hégenheim, coll. “Les inédits du Sundgau”, 2020, 200 p. |
| 260 | _c2022. | ||
| 500 | _a31 | ||
| 520 | _aEthnological heritage, and then intangible cultural heritage (ICH), have often been at the heart of new heritage projects over the last thirty years, driven in particular by non-institutional actors such as associations. But this is not the case everywhere. Based on a survey carried out in Picardy (Aisne and Somme), this article examines the reasons why, in this region, heritage associations have been created mainly around the monument and ’great’ history, while attempts by cultural or political institutions to turn into heritage industrial sites, practices or popular objects have hardly met with any response. | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nEthnologie française | 52 | 3 | 2022-12-07 | p. 548-549 | 0046-2616 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-ethnologie-francaise-2022-3-page-548?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
| 999 |
_c1722861 _d1722861 |
||