| 000 | 01138cam a2200169 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20260322004355.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aCuisenier, Jean _eauthor |
| 700 | 1 | 0 |
_aConte, Francis _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aOn the edge of Europe, Ukraine |
| 260 | _c2022. | ||
| 500 | _a89 | ||
| 520 | _aEthnological heritage, and then intangible cultural heritage (ICH), have often been at the heart of new heritage projects over the last thirty years, driven in particular by non-institutional actors such as associations. But this is not the case everywhere. Based on a survey carried out in Picardy (Aisne and Somme), this article examines the reasons why, in this region, heritage associations have been created mainly around the monument and ’great’ history, while attempts by cultural or political institutions to turn into heritage industrial sites, practices or popular objects have hardly met with any response. | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nEthnologie française | 52 | 3 | 2022-12-07 | p. 563-571 | 0046-2616 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-ethnologie-francaise-2022-3-page-563?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
| 999 |
_c1739802 _d1739802 |
||