000			01342cam a2200157 4500500
005			20250112040244.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aBachelet, Jean-René _eauthor
245	0	0	_aMorale, morality
260			_c2007.
500			_a87
520			_aBeyond their resemblance, how can “morale” and “morality,” be linked? When addressing the topic of “moral force,” this is the question raised, provoked by a measure of reticence from some who are often foreign to the military world. The first link observed may seem paradoxical: on the first level, morale resulting from high consistency between the values referenced and the action that will be taken, fits better with amorality—that of cynical pragmatism, the path of immorality, for example, Nazism—than our ethical references of civilization. You must, nonetheless, go farther: the objectively antagonistic demands of military effectiveness and humanist moral references can only be rendered by a morality—itself demanding—of the exercise of the profession of arms. It is the responsibility of the leaders to live it, promote it, and thus, beyond emotions, nourish morale in their subordinates.
786	0		_nInflexions | o 6 | 2 | 2007-05-02 | p. 27-37 | 1772-3760
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-inflexions-2007-2-page-27?lang=en
999			_c175615 _d175615