000			04027cam a2200313 4500500
005			20260322010446.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aChadefaux, Pierre _eauthor
245	0	0	_aCarte carbone : nouvel horizon de la politique environnementale
260			_c2026.
500			_a86
520			_aLe colloque intitulé « Les quotas carbone individuels, un instrument pour la politique climatique ? Regards interdisciplinaires » a réuni diverses disciplines pour explorer l’opportunité, l’efficacité et la faisabilité d’un dispositif encore inédit : la carte carbone. Ce mécanisme vise à réguler les émissions de gaz à effet de serre (GES) des particuliers par le biais de quotas individuels. Inspirée du système d’échange de quotas d’émission de l’Union européenne (SEQE-UE), la carte carbone attribuerait à chaque citoyen une quantité fixe de quotas, à utiliser pour compenser l’empreinte carbone des biens et services consommés. Le colloque a abordé plusieurs questions cruciales : le rôle de l’État dans la fixation du prix ou la régulation du marché, les parallèles historiques avec d’autres systèmes de rationnement, l’efficacité du dispositif en termes de justice sociale, ainsi que ses implications sur les libertés fondamentales et les droits individuels.
520			_aThe symposium, titled ‘Individual carbon quotas: a tool for climate policy? Interdisciplinary perspectives’ brought together experts from various disciplines to examine the opportunity, effectiveness, and feasibility of a novel policy proposal: the carbon card. This mechanism seeks to regulate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from individuals through a system of individual carbon quotas. Drawing inspiration from the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), the carbon card would allocate a fixed amount of quotas to each individual, which could then be used to offset the carbon footprint of the goods and services they consume. The discussions during the symposium covered a wide range of topics, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of the issue at hand. A central focus was the role of the State in setting the price of carbon and determining whether the market should have a role in this process. The participants explored historical parallels with rationing systems, drawing attention to the ways in which these systems have been implemented and their potential lessons for the carbon card. A significant part of the debate also centered on the social justice implications of such a policy. Speakers considered how a carbon card could impact different social groups, particularly the most vulnerable, and whether it would lead to a fair distribution of emission reductions. Moreover, questions were raised about the potential infringement of fundamental freedoms and individual rights, as the carbon card could be seen as a form of surveillance or control over personal consumption choices. Overall, the symposium highlighted the complexity of introducing a carbon card system, drawing attention to both the potential benefits, such as reducing individual emissions and promoting awareness of personal environmental impact, and the challenges, including the need for political, economic, and social considerations to be addressed in order to make the policy effective and equitable.
690			_adroits environnementaux
690			_aémissions de gaz à effet de serre
690			_afiscalité environnementale
690			_amarché du carbone
690			_aplanification étatique
690			_apolitiques climatiques
690			_acarbon market
690			_aclimate policies
690			_aenvironmental rights
690			_aenvironmental taxation
690			_agreenhouse gas emissions
690			_aState planning
786	0		_nNatures Sciences Sociétés | 33 | 3 | 2026-03-03 | p. 331-338 | 1240-1307
856	4	1	_uhttps://stm.cairn.info/revue-natures-sciences-societes-2025-3-page-331?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c1756767 _d1756767