000			01557cam a2200301 4500500
005			20250112042608.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aBras, Gérard _eauthor
245	0	0	_aHow could we have been Stalinists?
260			_c2021.
500			_a51
520			_a“How can the same person fully embrace their initial choices—joining anti-fascist struggles as early as 1935, joining the French Communist Party in the midst of war—when the present state of the world now forces them to reject a large part of their own past that was, nonetheless, the future of their choices?” Desanti wrote. The phenomenological investigation conducted in Un Destin philosophique (“A Philosophical Destiny”) by Desanti himself requires a new investigation, away from autobiographical anecdotes and historical causal explanations which cannot fully account for the involvement of a subject in a belief. Far from the common concepts of adherence and denial, Desanti paves a personal path made of belief, ethical bias, and political commitment that includes his readers.
690			_aStalinism
690			_aAutobiography
690			_aphilosophy
690			_acommitment
690			_abelief
690			_aphenomenology
690			_aAutobiography
690			_aphilosophy
690			_astalinism
690			_abelief
690			_acomiquement
690			_aphenomenology
786	0		_nLa Pensée | 404 | 4 | 2021-02-17 | p. 56-69 | 0031-4773
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-la-pensee-2020-4-page-56?lang=en
999			_c184021 _d184021