| 000 | 01649cam a2200253 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250112044146.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aPlantin, Christian _eauthor |
| 700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Guerrini, Jean-Claude _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _a“Learning and the development of new modes of citizenship are both issues that significantly renew the theories of argumentation” |
| 260 | _c2018. | ||
| 500 | _a63 | ||
| 520 | _aThis interview with Christian Plantin focuses on the Dictionnaire de l’argumentation published in 2016 by ENS Éditions, Lyon; translated and adapted into English as A Dictionary of Argumentation, London, College Publications, 2018. The idea of a dictionary comes from the inexistence of such an instrument (there was no dictionary of the argumentation, neither in French nor in English), and from the need for definitions, as voiced particularly in doctoral seminars. The dictionary is grounded on four main principles: argumentation is approached 1) as an interactional and interdiscursive phenomenon; 2) as an evaluative activity, the evaluation being the responsibility of the participants, not of the analyst; 3) in relation to knowledge construction and management; 4) as necessarily involving affects and emotions. | ||
| 690 | _arhetoric | ||
| 690 | _aargumentation | ||
| 690 | _adialectic | ||
| 690 | _asocio-scientific issues | ||
| 690 | _ainteractions | ||
| 690 | _ascience acquisition | ||
| 690 | _adiscourse | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nMots. Les langages du politique | o 118 | 3 | 2018-11-15 | p. 157-176 | 0243-6450 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-mots-2018-3-page-157?lang=en |
| 999 |
_c189584 _d189584 |
||