000 | 01811cam a2200277zu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 88844630 | ||
003 | FRCYB88844630 | ||
005 | 20250107112852.0 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr un | ||
008 | 250107s2016 fr | o|||||0|0|||eng d | ||
020 | _a9783035109528 | ||
035 | _aFRCYB88844630 | ||
040 |
_aFR-PaCSA _ben _c _erda |
||
100 | 1 | _aRodríguez-Aguilera de Prat, Cesáreo | |
245 | 0 | 1 |
_aThe European Democratic Deficit _bThe Response of the Parties in the 2014 Elections _c['Rodríguez-Aguilera de Prat, Cesáreo'] |
264 | 1 |
_bPeter Lang _c2016 |
|
300 | _a p. | ||
336 |
_btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_bc _2rdamdedia |
||
338 |
_bc _2rdacarrier |
||
650 | 0 | _a | |
700 | 0 | _aRodríguez-Aguilera de Prat, Cesáreo | |
856 | 4 | 0 |
_2Cyberlibris _uhttps://international.scholarvox.com/netsen/book/88844630 _qtext/html _a |
520 | _aThe «never-ending crisis» that started in 2008 and the technocratic and fiscal measures demanded by the «Troika» have aggravated the EU’s so-called «democratic deficit» more than ever before. In this essay the principal theoretical and practical dimensions of this phenomenon at the levels of institution, procedure and social legitimacy are set out and developed. With this in mind, the dysfunctions in the architecture of the institutions, the elite, complex and opaque mechanisms in decision-making and, most importantly, the growing critical estrangement of many citizens reveals that poor democratic quality of the EU constitutes its principal and most serious political problem. To empirically illustrate this debate, Rodríguez-Aguilera evaluates the positions and proposals of the parties in the six most populous countries that have addressed this issue through a comparative analysis of their political programmes. | ||
999 |
_c18996 _d18996 |