000			01612cam a2200253 4500500
005			20250112045713.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aAndolfatto, Dominique _eauthor
245	0	0	_a“Renovating social democracy”
260			_c2014.
500			_a11
520			_aProfessional relations “à la française” underwent a significant change of their rules in 2008. This paper analyzes the debates that led to this reform as well as the way it was produced. The reform was negotiated between labor unions, employers, and the state. Two characteristics of the implementation of the reform—measuring the audience of labor unions and transparency related to their financing—show that the objectives have not yet been reached. Participation in professional elections remains contrasted and in decline; the union environment was not simplified; the transparency of union financing is only a formality; sub-unionization continues… Obviously, no fundamental changes occurred in spite of the shake-up of the legal rules. It raises questions about the reality of the “renovation of the social democracy” that was planned.
690			_asocial dialogue
690			_atrade unions
690			_arepresentativeness
690			_atrade union resources
690			_aprofessionnal elections
690			_aemployers organizations
690			_ademocracy at work
690			_awelfare policy
786	0		_nPolitiques de communication | o 2 | 1 | 2014-04-01 | p. 13-50 | 2271-068X
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-politiques-de-communication-2014-1-page-13?lang=en
999			_c195465 _d195465