000			01722cam a2200217 4500500
005			20250112050909.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aRenard, Laurent _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Cloutier, Martin _eauthor
245	0	0	_aDesign, Science, and Technology: What are the models and ideal types of design science research?
260			_c2019.
500			_a34
520			_aWhile Science and Design seem to be singled out and treated as core disciplines in Design Science Research (DSR), Technology tends to have a more tenuous role or is not properly distinguished from Design. The coherence and consistency of the elements of this trialectic do not seem to have been thoroughly examined in the existing theoretical work on design science-based research in management and information systems (IS). To clarify the coherence and consistency of this trialectic made up of Science, Technology, and Design, this article proposes a model of DSR based on the identification and distinction of the three fundamental disciplines of Design, Technology, and Science and their respective disciplinary matrices. This article also aims aim to construct and illustrate, through examples drawn from scientific papers, three ideal types of DSR that are different configurations of these three fundamental disciplines: artifactual research; technological research; and artifactual AND technological research.
690			_adata management
690			_amaturity assessment tool
690			_adesign science
690			_adata governance
786	0		_nProjectics / Proyéctica / Projectique | o 20 | 2 | 2019-02-26 | p. 63-89 | 2031-9703
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-projectics-2018-2-page-63?lang=en
999			_c200368 _d200368