000			01949cam a2200277 4500500
005			20250112051132.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aCrevoisier, Michaël _eauthor
245	0	0	_aDeleuze and a “clinical approach to difference.” Art at the service of analysis
260			_c2022.
500			_a65
520			_aThe theme of the “clinical” runs through Gilles Deleuze’s work without appearing explicitly as a major concept. However, the borrowing of this term from the medical field implies a critical discussion on the ways in which medicine, including psychoanalysis, analyzes symptoms and determines clinical presentations. The challenge for Deleuze is to emancipate the clinical approach from its medical objective of identifying a patient’s condition with a pathology, by proposing to make clinical practice the means of describing the signs emitted by a subject experiencing new physical and mental states. This broadening of the meaning of clinical practice makes it a method of philosophical investigation whose objective is to follow signs usually judged aberrant or even “asignifiant,” forcing the gaze and the discourse to invent ways of seeing and saying. In this article, we first seek to define the Deleuzian meaning of the clinical approach, and then we show how this method is part of the project of a philosophy of difference. Finally, using examples, we clarify the central role of art (in particular literature) in a “clinical approach to difference.”
690			_aclinical approach
690			_acritical
690			_aphilosophy of difference
690			_aart
690			_aGilles Deleuze
690			_acritical
690			_aphilosophy of difference
690			_aart
690			_aclinical
690			_aGilles Deleuze
786	0		_nPSN | Volume 20 | 2 | 2022-07-27 | p. 57-73 | 1639-8319
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-psn-2022-2-page-57?lang=en
999			_c201185 _d201185