000			02374cam a2200289zu 4500
001			88845841
003			FRCYB88845841
005			20250107114123.0
006			m o d
007			cr un
008			250107s2014 fr | o|||||0|0|||eng d
020			_a9783035264951
035			_aFRCYB88845841
040			_aFR-PaCSA _ben _c _erda
100	1		_aDumont, Daniel
245	0	1	_aActivation Policies for the Unemployed, the Right to Work and the Duty to Work _c['Dumont, Daniel', 'Dermine, Elise']
264		1	_bPeter Lang _c2014
300			_a p.
336			_btxt _2rdacontent
337			_bc _2rdamdedia
338			_bc _2rdacarrier
650		0	_a
700	0		_aDumont, Daniel
700	0		_aDermine, Elise
856	4	0	_2Cyberlibris _uhttps://international.scholarvox.com/netsen/book/88845841 _qtext/html _a
520			_aSince the 1990s and the 2000s, Western social protection systems have experienced a turn towards activation. This turn consists of the multiplication of measures aimed at bringing those who are unemployed closer to participation in the labour market. These measures often induce a strengthening of the conditions that must be met in order to receive social benefits. It is in this well known context that the authors gathered in this book decided to take a closer look at the relationship between activation policies for the unemployed and the right and the duty to work. If activation measures are likely to increase transitions towards the labour market, we can also make the assumption that they may, particularly when they are marked with the seal of coercion, hinder or dramatically reduce the right to freely chosen work. In such circumstances, the realisation of the «right to work», which is often stated to be the aim of those who promote activation, tends in practice to be reduced to an increasing pressure being exerted on the unemployed. In this case, isn’t it actually the duty to work that is particularly reinforced? After an historical and philosophical perspective on the issue, this assumption is confronted with the developments observed in the United States and in France, and then with the guidelines laid down in international human rights instruments. What follows is a discussion of two alternatives to the dominant activation model: the basic income guarantee and the employment guarantee.
999			_c20149 _d20149