000			01612cam a2200349 4500500
005			20250112051225.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aKönig-Pralong, Catherine _eauthor
245	0	0	_aThe depths of reflexivity in the humanities and social sciences
260			_c2021.
500			_a18
520			_aThis paper is a reaction to an article by Wolf Feuerhahn, published in the same journal under the title “Researchers and the discourse of their objects.” It takes up Feuerhahn’s proposal, who advocates for a historicist approach in the social sciences and humanities, and requalifies it as “radical historicism.” It then discusses two points. First, it distinguishes presentism from anachronism, suggesting that the latter could be controlled and productive. Second, it investigates the limits of strict nominalism conceived of as a method—a textual approach that the author describes as “literality.”
690			_ahistory of knowledge
690			_anominalism
690			_apresentism
690			_ahistoricism
690			_ahistoriography
690			_aanachronism
690			_aliterality
690			_ahistorical semantics
690			_ahistory of knowledge
690			_anominalism
690			_apresentism
690			_ahistoricism
690			_ahistoriography
690			_aanachronism
690			_aliterality
690			_ahistorical semantics
786	0		_nQuestions de communication | o 38 | 2 | 2021-07-26 | p. 279-292 | 1633-5961
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-questions-de-communication-2020-2-page-279?lang=en
999			_c201587 _d201587