000			01938cam a2200217 4500500
005			20250112051405.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aBrassac, Christian _eauthor
245	0	0	_aA Praxeological View of Knowledge Architectures in Organizations
260			_c2007.
500			_a6
520			_aIn their book titled Architectures of Knowledge, Amin and Cohendet (2004) propose an approach to the mobilization of knowledge in the firm, and beyond the firm, in human organizations that place priority on embodied, socially inscribed practices anchored in artefacts. This leads them to largely remodel the theory of collective knowledge mobilization. At the center of this new conceptualization is the community, seen as a place where this intersubjective, social practice is effected. In doing so, they offer a broad, rich, and well-articulated epistemological background that can be called a “praxeology”, and a methodology based on an ethnography, a clinic of the flow of knowledge in organizations. In this text I propose a reading of this conceptualization from a psychologist point of view. I do so by pointing out that there is a important proximity between their epistemological roots (american pragmatism, maturanian and varelian enactionism, situated action, socio-culturalism, and the Science Studies movement) and some works which consider the cognitive processes as being primarly socially inscribed practices instead of brain informational processes. In doing so, I argue the possibility to base this type of reflexion on a meadian perspective.
690			_aintersubjectivity
690			_asocial psychology
690			_aGeorge Herbert Mead
690			_acommunuty
690			_apraxeology
786	0		_nRevue d'anthropologie des connaissances | 1o 1 | 1 | 2007-02-21 | p. 121-135
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-anthropologie-des-connaissances-2007-1-page-121?lang=en
999			_c202253 _d202253