000			02177cam a2200289zu 4500
001			88846055
003			FRCYB88846055
005			20250107114401.0
006			m o d
007			cr un
008			250107s2014 fr | o|||||0|0|||eng d
020			_a9783035264548
035			_aFRCYB88846055
040			_aFR-PaCSA _ben _c _erda
100	1		_aRaulet, Gérard
245	0	1	_aEuropean Constitutionalism _bHistorical and Contemporary Perspectives _c['Raulet, Gérard', 'Dupeyrix, Alexandre']
264		1	_bPeter Lang _c2014
300			_a p.
336			_btxt _2rdacontent
337			_bc _2rdamdedia
338			_bc _2rdacarrier
650		0	_a
700	0		_aRaulet, Gérard
700	0		_aDupeyrix, Alexandre
856	4	0	_2Cyberlibris _uhttps://international.scholarvox.com/netsen/book/88846055 _qtext/html _a
520			_aThe deep economic crisis that Europe has been facing for several years can be seen as both a cause and a consequence of the political indecision with which the European Community or European Union has been living for so long now. The end-goal of this unique political project has never been clarified. While its objective – to guarantee peace, security, justice and wealth – was certainly explicit from the start and has been repeated in the various treaties underlying the Community or Union, the institutional and political means necessary to attain these goals have so far remained undetermined. In these times of turmoil, this lack of clarity turns out to be a latent defect within the EU. The issue of European constitutionalism paradigmatically illustrates the conceptual, political and legal difficulties that confront us when we try to define the EU and imagine its possible developments and transformations. It emphasizes one of the paradoxes of the European project: it is unable to develop without constitutionalizing the European legal framework but also unable to find the appropriate manner in which to do so, or gain the support of the European peoples. These difficulties are caused by a variety of historical, conceptual and legal factors, which the present volume attempts to identify and discuss.
999			_c20404 _d20404