000 01859cam a2200289 4500500
005 20250112051844.0
041 _afre
042 _adc
100 1 0 _aDel Sol, Marion
_eauthor
700 1 0 _a Turquet, Pascale
_eauthor
245 0 0 _aEmployee top-up health insurance through the lens of fiscal welfare… what’s going wrong in France?
260 _c2021.
500 _a100
520 _aThis article simultaneously examines the rationality, legitimacy and equity of socio-fiscal expenditure aimed at implementing collective top-up health insurance schemes within businesses. This type of spending is fairly well-established, but changed fundamentally from the 1 January 2016, from which date businesses are required to finance at least 50% of supplementary health cover for their employees. The system of incentives which dominated previously has therefore given way to one of subsidisation of private insurance purchasing. Though numerous questions and criticisms have been raised in relation to the inconsistent and unequal nature of such subsidisation as well as the inefficient coexistence of “AMO” (assurance maladie obligatoire = compulsory health insurance) and “AMC” (assurance maladie complémentaire = supplementary or top-up health insurance), private insurance does nevertheless seem to be the inevitable destination of reforms to health insurance.
690 _aine-quality
690 _ahealth insurance
690 _afiscal welfare
690 _aFrance
690 _aprivate health insurance
690 _aine-quality
690 _ahealth insurance
690 _afiscal welfare
690 _aFrance
690 _aprivate health insurance
786 0 _nLa Revue de l'Ires | o 103-104 | 1 | 2021-10-15 | p. 45-73 | 1145-1378
856 4 1 _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-de-l-ires-2021-1-page-45?lang=en
999 _c204305
_d204305