000			01349cam a2200217 4500500
005			20250112052839.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aZafiropoulos, Markos _eauthor
245	0	0	_aWhat Lacan Said About Totem and Taboo
260			_c2016.
500			_a12
520			_aThis article sets out to revisit Totem and Taboo as the keystone to all psychoanalytic anthropology, from case studies to group analysis. Furthermore, offering a preliminary repositioning of this founding issue must necessarily lead us to place this within the perspective of what Lacan said about Totem and Taboo in his return to Freud. This article thus identifies the different moments in Lacan’s reading of the Freudian myth. These different moments find their essential pivotal point in Lacan’s transference to Lévi-Strauss at the time that he was re-grounding psychoanalysis, setting aside his familial-centered vision in favor of a structuralist reading, in which the laws of language and speech outclass those of the family.
690			_aCanguilhem
690			_aneuroscience
690			_aFreud
690			_apathological
690			_anormal
786	0		_nResearch in Psychoanalysis | o 21 | 1 | 2016-05-31 | p. 117-125 | 1767-5448
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-research-in-psychoanalysis1-2016-1-page-117?lang=en
999			_c208019 _d208019