000 02220cam a2200289 4500500
005 20250112052842.0
041 _afre
042 _adc
100 1 0 _aJuskewycz, Nicolas
_eauthor
700 1 0 _a Dafri, Farid
_eauthor
700 1 0 _a Journet, François
_eauthor
700 1 0 _a Molinié, Magali
_eauthor
700 1 0 _a Thurin, Monique
_eauthor
700 1 0 _a Thurin, Jean-Michel
_eauthor
700 1 0 _a Ellerby, Kirsten
_eauthor
245 0 0 _aThe Case Study of Max
260 _c2019.
500 _a49
520 _aThis article presents a complex case which was treated through psychotherapy. This study was undertaken in the first instance using the methodology of the French Psychotherapy Practice-Based Research Network ( Réseau de Recherches Fondées sur les Pratiques Psychothérapiques), then subsequently in the course of a seminar made up of experienced clinicians. The study focuses on the process of change by highlighting the actions and attitudes of the therapist to support his patients in tackling his problems and sufferings. Several evaluations tools (qualitative and quantitative) are used. To begin with the Case Formulation, that brings to bare a fundamental clinical expertise; then two tools centred on the patient: the Health-Sickness Rating Scale and the Psychodynamic Functioning Scale; and finally a tool specific to psychotherapy, the Psychotherapy process-Q-set. The methodology put in place makes it possible to have reliable indications regarding what is taking place in the psychotherapy, and the impact it is having on the positive evolution of the patient. Discussion of the results after a year of therapy already make it possible to draw links between theory and practice on certain aspects, notably the framework, or the difficult place of the therapist in this psychotherapeutic context. This is in-depth research, and an account of the “Case Study”.
690 _aCanguilhem
690 _aneuroscience
690 _aFreud
690 _apathological
690 _anormal
786 0 _nResearch in Psychoanalysis | o 26 | 2 | 2019-04-17 | p. 90-109 | 1767-5448
856 4 1 _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-research-in-psychoanalysis1-2018-2-page-90?lang=en
999 _c208051
_d208051